I just completed an article titled The Circle of Soccer Life and it occurs to me the necessity of having coaching resources never diminishes until you stop coaching. I have previously mentioned participating in a couple of coaching email lists with colleagues from all over the world. The groups are comprised of high school, college and professional coaches. They have been a huge benefit to me. We share ideas, discuss various topics and exchange information. When I need a sounding board or simply to vent about soccer related matters, these are the people I turn to. If I get things right, they pat me on the back and maybe help me understand how I could have done it even better. If I get it wrong, they set me straight, do so quickly and in a very direct manner!
The culture of a program is a consistently constant topic of discussion within one of these groups. There has been some truly fascinating insight shared over the years. I have implemented many of the ideas shared with the teams I coach. Last night one of the members of this list asked a couple questions of another list member that really struck a chord with me. I want to share those questions and some of my own observations with you today.
First, I want to acknowledge I have not formally made members of this email group aware of the CBA Soccer Blog. I know some members are aware of it. I am not sure all are. No particular reason behind this. I write as much for myself as I do for our many faithful readers from around the globe. It is both a cathartic and educational experience for me.
The Question:
How much bearing do you think the success of your program has on how your players react to leadership?
Paraphrasing the Follow Up Question:
If the current coaching staff leaves and is replaced by inexperienced coaches, would the leadership lessons the players learned under the tutelage of the former staff continue for any decent amount of time after their departure or is such a culture tied to the success the former staff brought to the program?
My mind immediately went to the local high school program that my son participates in. A long tenured coach resigned last fall and a new staff consisting of former players of his were hired. One would think the successful and winning cultures would remain fairly entrenched with former players from the program taking over as the new coaches. My observations suggest that has not been the case.
The previous coach had accumulated 330 wins when he retired. The program had peaked in the early 2000's, but had been in steady decline over the last handful of seasons. One could truthfully proclaim the energy had gone from the program. The new staff most definitely returned some of the missing energy, but the slippage in culture has continued.
Under the leadership of the former coach success on the field continued even as energy obviously ebbed from the program. If that coaching staff had remained, I believe this years team may have won 10 games with the aid of continued tradition and mystique. The actual on-field results this season saw a meager 4 victories and the change in leadership has undoubtedly been responsible to some degree.
We are talking about leadership backed by a proven track record versus leadership with no track record. Trust is a word that comes to mind. Even with growing discontent, the former staff had the trust of enough players. The new staff has made and continues to make significant changes to formation and systems of play instead of maintaining a link through continuity to the previous coaching regime. By doing so, they also made a clean break with the culture the former staff had built into the program.
The questions posed to the coaches of the email list last night are essentially about how change might impact a program. The thing about change is some people are resistant to it while others will openly embrace change. In the end change is accepted or you get left behind in a manner of speaking. The real significance found in these questions and in using our local program as an illustration is the importance of how change is managed.
Thanks once and-again to the invaluable resource of our coaching email lists. I wouldn't be near the coach I am without them. And I would never ascend to the coach I will yet become without their continued guidance and support.
Welcome to the web home of Conceive Believe Achieve Soccer. We specialize in conducting high school team camps. This website began as a means to promote our camps and keep campers informed of upcoming opportunities. There are now over 650 articles archived here. Use the search function in the right hand column below to find ones on topic for you. You may contact us at coachtjbrown@gmail.com or 567-204-6083 Thanks for visiting!
Showing posts with label peers. Show all posts
Showing posts with label peers. Show all posts
Friday
Sunday
Ask for help.
One thing I have learned from coaching is the necessity and benefit of asking for help. The more perspectives on a matter, the better in many cases. I value assistants who will speak up and offer input even when... perhaps especially when... their opinion differs from my own. That has never been more true than this spring.
In coaching two teams I am sometimes spread pretty thin. Admittedly this accentuates the tunnel vision I am prone to during a season anyway. In recent matches I asked assistants to manage the game for me, give the half time talk and generally assume the responsibilities of a head coach in the game. I learned a lot through how they interpreted the games they managed. Their substitution rotations and patterns differed from my own. The positions they played some in differed as well. Not only did I take notice of all this, but I embraced some of the things the assistants did and incorporated them into my own management of games.
Another thing I do is to seek input from players on a wide range of matters. I will ask players to suggest starting line ups. I seek their input on positions. I encourage their input during matches, at half time and in post game evaluations. I have found a players perspective can be among the most enlightening.
I will also ask coaching peers for their input. Sometimes I ask someone to come observe a match. Other times I will send video of a game to colleagues and ask for their impressions. I did this very thing recently as I struggled to find the 11 best to start games and the substitution rotations that would keep us well balanced throughout the game. I went so far to seek input on who the 10 best field players were on the team and how they might fit into a lineup.
One observation from a group of colleagues was that opponents seemed to pick on our left back position. I knew this was happening, but assumed it was because most teams are right foot dominant. My peers thought that was not necessarily the case and suggested I move the left back(s) to the right back spot to see what happened. It did not take long to discover teams were "picking on" players more so than the left back position. One player really struggles with first touch and opponents seem to sense they can pressure him into mistakes. The other was very offensive minded and slight of build. Opponents seem to think they can out-muscle him and take advantage of his aggressiveness in attack.
An associated observation was that we were wasting the talent of the player manning the right back position. It was suggested he needs to get a lot more touches on the ball. That was one I had wrestled with quite a bit as it was my son manning the right back position. We were told he is the best right back in the state by ODP coaches. So, right back seemed to make sense, but it appears it really doesn't in this case. We were probably wasting his talent at right back when he could use it as a center mid.
Fitting a formation to the talent on hand can also be a difficult. In terms of center midfielders the talent we have suggests playing 3 of them. We tried this early in the season and it was a disaster. I perhaps abandoned the 4-5-1 formation to quickly, but the team settled in pretty well in a 4-4-2 before opponents began exploiting our aggressive attacking mentalities at the position by counter attacking directly down the middle of the pitch.
To say the team was underachieving and that my inability to uncover the 11 who would play best together was a root cause would be a significant understatement. So, as I have already stated, I asked for help. I spoke with coaching colleagues and peers. I shared match video with them. I spoke with players. I asked referees I know and who had officiated our matches for their input.
Position and personnel changes have followed. We now play a 4-1-4-1 having inserted my son in as the one holding midfielder. We had one very accomplished forward and playing him as a lone forwarded opened space for him to play in. We have strengthened the back line and improved the defensive presence in the midfield. And tonight the final piece may have fallen in place for us - thanks to input from an assistant coach we found a second player more than capable of playing the target forward position. The team is beginning to play closer to their potential. Possession and ball movement has improved. Varied attacks and multiple goal scorers are becoming the norm.
Some feathers have been ruffled. With every decision there are consequences and as I alluded to earlier some players have lost starting positions leading to dissatisfaction with my decision-making. I have had to speak with some individuals about accepting new roles for the good of the team. Some embrace this idea while others are more selfish in pouting about the change in their role perceiving it as a demotion or a reduction of their importance to the team which isn't the case at all. It's nothing other than a change - no more and no less.
However, there have been rewards as well. The former left back who struggled with first touch has had much better touch as a midfielder and forward. I am not yet quite sure how to interpret this. He had several "whiffs' in the games before the position switch and not a one since? He has played as defender for a couple of seasons and I wonder if he became bored with the position or perhaps merely wanted to play a different position? It might be that I rarely substitute backs and he has been fresher physically and mentally in playing fewer minutes thereby reducing mistakes caused by fatigue. He is now playing in 12-15 min shifts with short breaks between them and making far fewer mistakes.
The new right back has a tremendous leg he is using to switch fields and explosive speed he is using in combination play with midfielders to get himself into the attack. The new left back has given us a physical presence, improved and increased distributions in starting the attack. Our new holding mid is protecting the center backs, providing the pivot in transition, switching play and distributing the ball extremely well. A former forward is being allowed to play to his strengths as a midfield wing.
Overall the team is beginning to click. I take the blame for it taking this long, but also accept the credit in the sense that I am the one who ultimately makes the decision. However the real credit goes to Steve, Marc, Phil, Bruce, Randy, Keith, Mac, Billy, Kyle, Dave, Greg, et al. and our players who have provided input and insight. Without contributions from our coaches, colleagues, peers, players and officials I fear my tunnel vision would still be inhibiting the teams ability to play closer to their potential. So it is, that on behalf of our team, I thank each and every one of you who have shared thoughts and suggestions with me to date. Please, please, please keep up the good work!
In coaching two teams I am sometimes spread pretty thin. Admittedly this accentuates the tunnel vision I am prone to during a season anyway. In recent matches I asked assistants to manage the game for me, give the half time talk and generally assume the responsibilities of a head coach in the game. I learned a lot through how they interpreted the games they managed. Their substitution rotations and patterns differed from my own. The positions they played some in differed as well. Not only did I take notice of all this, but I embraced some of the things the assistants did and incorporated them into my own management of games.
Another thing I do is to seek input from players on a wide range of matters. I will ask players to suggest starting line ups. I seek their input on positions. I encourage their input during matches, at half time and in post game evaluations. I have found a players perspective can be among the most enlightening.
I will also ask coaching peers for their input. Sometimes I ask someone to come observe a match. Other times I will send video of a game to colleagues and ask for their impressions. I did this very thing recently as I struggled to find the 11 best to start games and the substitution rotations that would keep us well balanced throughout the game. I went so far to seek input on who the 10 best field players were on the team and how they might fit into a lineup.
One observation from a group of colleagues was that opponents seemed to pick on our left back position. I knew this was happening, but assumed it was because most teams are right foot dominant. My peers thought that was not necessarily the case and suggested I move the left back(s) to the right back spot to see what happened. It did not take long to discover teams were "picking on" players more so than the left back position. One player really struggles with first touch and opponents seem to sense they can pressure him into mistakes. The other was very offensive minded and slight of build. Opponents seem to think they can out-muscle him and take advantage of his aggressiveness in attack.
An associated observation was that we were wasting the talent of the player manning the right back position. It was suggested he needs to get a lot more touches on the ball. That was one I had wrestled with quite a bit as it was my son manning the right back position. We were told he is the best right back in the state by ODP coaches. So, right back seemed to make sense, but it appears it really doesn't in this case. We were probably wasting his talent at right back when he could use it as a center mid.
Fitting a formation to the talent on hand can also be a difficult. In terms of center midfielders the talent we have suggests playing 3 of them. We tried this early in the season and it was a disaster. I perhaps abandoned the 4-5-1 formation to quickly, but the team settled in pretty well in a 4-4-2 before opponents began exploiting our aggressive attacking mentalities at the position by counter attacking directly down the middle of the pitch.
To say the team was underachieving and that my inability to uncover the 11 who would play best together was a root cause would be a significant understatement. So, as I have already stated, I asked for help. I spoke with coaching colleagues and peers. I shared match video with them. I spoke with players. I asked referees I know and who had officiated our matches for their input.
Position and personnel changes have followed. We now play a 4-1-4-1 having inserted my son in as the one holding midfielder. We had one very accomplished forward and playing him as a lone forwarded opened space for him to play in. We have strengthened the back line and improved the defensive presence in the midfield. And tonight the final piece may have fallen in place for us - thanks to input from an assistant coach we found a second player more than capable of playing the target forward position. The team is beginning to play closer to their potential. Possession and ball movement has improved. Varied attacks and multiple goal scorers are becoming the norm.
Some feathers have been ruffled. With every decision there are consequences and as I alluded to earlier some players have lost starting positions leading to dissatisfaction with my decision-making. I have had to speak with some individuals about accepting new roles for the good of the team. Some embrace this idea while others are more selfish in pouting about the change in their role perceiving it as a demotion or a reduction of their importance to the team which isn't the case at all. It's nothing other than a change - no more and no less.
However, there have been rewards as well. The former left back who struggled with first touch has had much better touch as a midfielder and forward. I am not yet quite sure how to interpret this. He had several "whiffs' in the games before the position switch and not a one since? He has played as defender for a couple of seasons and I wonder if he became bored with the position or perhaps merely wanted to play a different position? It might be that I rarely substitute backs and he has been fresher physically and mentally in playing fewer minutes thereby reducing mistakes caused by fatigue. He is now playing in 12-15 min shifts with short breaks between them and making far fewer mistakes.
The new right back has a tremendous leg he is using to switch fields and explosive speed he is using in combination play with midfielders to get himself into the attack. The new left back has given us a physical presence, improved and increased distributions in starting the attack. Our new holding mid is protecting the center backs, providing the pivot in transition, switching play and distributing the ball extremely well. A former forward is being allowed to play to his strengths as a midfield wing.
Overall the team is beginning to click. I take the blame for it taking this long, but also accept the credit in the sense that I am the one who ultimately makes the decision. However the real credit goes to Steve, Marc, Phil, Bruce, Randy, Keith, Mac, Billy, Kyle, Dave, Greg, et al. and our players who have provided input and insight. Without contributions from our coaches, colleagues, peers, players and officials I fear my tunnel vision would still be inhibiting the teams ability to play closer to their potential. So it is, that on behalf of our team, I thank each and every one of you who have shared thoughts and suggestions with me to date. Please, please, please keep up the good work!
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)